College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Staff editorial: Mailing it in

By Diamondback editorial board

|

Published: Monday, November 16, 2009

Updated: Monday, November 16, 2009

Convincing the masses can be an uphill battle, especially when the masses are cynical college students with a natural desire to hate “the man.” Nonetheless, in recent weeks, the administration has attempted to persuade the university community it truly cares about diversity. The day after student protesters descended on the Main Administration Building, Provost Nariman Farvardin published a guest column on this page affirming his commitment to diversity. Yesterday morning, students were greeted by an e-mail from university President Dan Mote expressing his goal to build “a great university with diversity woven into its fabric.”

Clichés and repetitiveness aside, the truth is the university is trying. Neither Farvardin nor Mote would have signed their names to these documents had they not seen a real problem. Farvardin removed the top administrative diversity post days after a diversity town hall and weeks after the revelation black enrollment had plummeted. Talk about bad timing. Administrators have been scrambling since to wash their hands of this mess.

They’ve shown some understanding of the problems at hand. But administrators must realize that no opinion column or early morning e-mail is going to change anyone’s mind. While these reactions are expected from any organization under siege from disenchanted students and faculty, they are minimal damage control when it comes to the bigger picture. Talk only gets you so far. Concrete steps must be taken if the administration wants to be taken seriously.

As we discussed yesterday, the administration — Farvardin in particular — is beginning to face serious trust issues. Administrators must realize every day they fail to engage the university community and those who are organizing the protests and mobilizing students, they fall deeper into a hole.

President Mote and university officials should begin serious engagement with students — sooner rather than later — to get to the root of the problem. It shouldn’t be held behind closed doors, like Farvardin’s meeting with a select group of student leaders the day of the protest, but for all to hear and see. Administrators would show courage and commitment by allowing the university community to actually listen in instead of keeping some out of the mix.

Also, administrators shouldn’t issue invitations to only student leaders. While Student Government Association officials and student group leaders do hold sway over many students, the issue of diversity isn’t about that. It is about everyday people from various backgrounds who make up the university community. Officials need to flesh out what is motivating them to take these actions. It should be apparent this issue extends far beyond the dismissal of Cordell Black — much larger problems have been brewing.

By pulling in everyday people to have a conversation with the leaders of the university administration, including Mote, officials would be sending a clear message that extends beyond mass e-mails and opinion pieces. Only through concrete actions will administrators be able to, as Mote wrote in his e-mail, assure that their commitments to diversity and inclusion are absolute and foundational.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments Log in to Comment

Cynthia eats my balls
Wed Nov 18 2009 13:20
"Convincing the masses can be an uphill battle, especially when the masses are cynical college students with a natural desire to hate 'the man.' "

Ha, yeah right. College students today are sooo rebellious and anti-authoritarian. They just can't stand the government telling them what to do or how to live or what to say. Oh, right, unless it's about health care, or the environment, or illegal immigrants, or affirmative action, or abortion, or "Service," or pretty much any other cause, in which case most college students march hand-in-hand with "the man," regurgitating talking points and idealogy word-for-word from the media and the White House. You college students are such rebels!!!

Your name
Tue Nov 17 2009 13:09
Mike R, did you have a website link in your comment? It takes a while to get approved if that's the case.
Mike R
Tue Nov 17 2009 11:29
I spent a half hour writing a response to this and those bastards still refuse to let me post it. I KNOW they are doing this on purpose, I just cannot figure out what is triggering their automated post blacklist. So much for "independent" or concerned about free speech. These hypocrites disgust me.
Mike R
Tue Nov 17 2009 11:25
This God-awful site decided to censor my post again, so I'm trying to see which words get blacklisted. rapist murderer drugs black white racist

If it actually posts this, somethings is seriously wrong as hell whatever detection system it's using..

Mike R
Tue Nov 17 2009 11:21
I can't imagine we'll ever see eye to eye on this issue, but since I'm already set tuition-wise at this school for the next four years, I don't really care what kind of policies these activists protest for in the name of fighting those "evil racist crackers" that supposedly have taken over America. But honestly, I really don't think their current method of protest is particularly effective at causing change. Just look at how much progress they've made at getting Dr. Mote to apologize over the slavery issue or getting Dr. Black's position reinstated. If I were you guys, I'd start by making it quite clear what I would do if I could be making administration decisions. Here's some suggestions:

1. Stop confusing the issue to the press. Be frank with what you really want- more black students and less of everyone else. I admit this is a legitimate opinion (though I don't particularly agree with it)- but you're not going to get anywhere with it if you keep arguing over like empty phrases like "commitment to diversity". We need to get to the "root of the problem" here!

2. Vastly increase affirmative action for incoming black freshmen. It is a statistical fact that black students do significantly worse on average on achievement tests like the SAT than any other racial groups (http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-08-25-SAT-scores_N.htm). This is clearly reflected in their ability to get accepted into colleges like UMD. Giving students an automatic 300 point boost on SAT scores simply for showing African/Caribbean-American descent would significantly even the playing field.

3. Give a discounted tuition exclusively for black students. Obviously if an education is cheaper for a certain group of high school graduates, they are more likely to sign up for that college. We could use a measure of color, similar to photographic grayscales- but from light tan to black. For every shade of brown a student is darker than on this scale, they would get $500 off the price of yearly tuition. They already get free handouts simply for being a minority, this would just be icing on the cake. Who wouldn't sign up for that?

4. Create more exclusively black organizations. You already have black churches, classrooms, political groups and support offices. How about black dormitories? Parking lots designated for use solely by black students? Maybe some exclusively black performance groups (oh wait, those already exist here, but you could always use more). Judging by the outrage over the loss of one of this particular organization, adding more would is clearly an important factor in getting potential black freshmen to apply.

5. Lobby the Maryland legislature to pass amendments that would repeal sentences specifically for convicted black felons. According to the New York Times, 1 in 9 black men and women between the ages of 20 and 34 are in jail right now, and the ratio is obviously more pronounced in the Baltimore area. Think about how many potential black college students UMD could get if the Maryland state prison system let out every black murderer, rapist and drug dealer on the streets today. You'd be set for life on that black student quota you've been fighting so hard for, and you'd be encouraging that spirit of diversity that apparently needs to be brought back to UMD! After all, for a school that wants their students to have a variety of cultures and backgrounds, why not throw in a few criminals into the mix? Sure, some people might complain, but they're just racist trailer trash, so we can ignore them. Right, Cynthia?

Now, some of you might think these policies are a bit extreme, but so is marching down to the administration office and threatening to riot if they dared to transfer one of their black employees to another department. If you do take my suggestions seriously, please let me know. Heck, I might even come on out and protest with you. Good luck!

Cynthia
Tue Nov 17 2009 00:10
Shut your mouth, you racist. Go back to the trailer park where you belong.
Your name
Mon Nov 16 2009 23:42
want concrete proof? they haven't cut the vast majority of these diversity programs' funding while cutting academic programs all over the place. how much do these diversity programs cost in total?

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In